| HOME | NEWS | EVENTS | LETTERS | RESEARCH | MEDIA REPORT | CONTACT |
|
Last
week was ‘TV Turn Off Week’ in the ‘Honoured
more in the breach than in the observance’, as they say, TV turn off week,
which was supported by 65 national organizations, was used to encourage
both children and adults to watch much less television.
But
why would groups like the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Well,
in the words of American Surgeon
General Dr. David Satcher who kicked off the 2001 event, "we are raising
the most overweight generation of youngsters in American history...This
week is about saving lives”
But
obesity is really just the tip of the iceberg, as reported in a recent
editorial (21 April) of the ‘New Scientist’ magazine. ‘In Denial’ ran the
headline. ‘Why are we so reluctant to accept that on-screen violence is
bad for us?’ Apparently
the link between exposure to media violence and aggression is double the
strength of the link between passive smoking and lung cancer! The report
continues, ‘each time you bawl out a stranger over the phone or loose it
with another driver from the safety of your car, consider that these too are aggressive acts which
studies have shown are more likely after repeated exposure to on-screen
violence … (therefore) it seems inappropriate to keep calling this
harmless entertainment’. The
New Scientist acknowledged, however, that, as with smoking, any criticism
of a multi-billion dollar business is bound to provoke a sharp
rebuttal. Some statistics: Children on average watch an estimated 18,000 murders on TV by age 18 and over 200,000 acts of violence
More information on
|